Court orders EFCC to release Jonathan's ex-ADC 'immediately'
Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:01:pm National
2.2K By sosa hills
A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Nigerian Army to immediately release Col. Ojogbane Adegbe, ex-ADC of former President Goodluck Jonathan.
In his ruling, Justice Yusuf Halilu, ordered the EFCC to release Adegbe on bail pending his arraignment in court. He also told the Nigerian army and any other government agency keeping Col. Adegbe in detention, to immediately obey the court's order, as the order was binding on every government agency.
Justice Halilu wondered why the EFCC had reduced itself to a "police station", stating that the agency must not go beyond what the law requires of it.
According to the judge, the EFCC had no right whatsoever, to detain an individual at will, adding that it was unconstitutional for the agency to keep Adegbe in detention for more than 24 hours.
After the counsel to Adegbe, Ogwu Onoja informed the court that the anti-graft agency had transferred his client to a military facility, the judge stated that his ruling was binding not only on the EFCC, but also on any agency keeping him in detention.
Adegbe hauled the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to court to challenge his arrest and continued detention by the anti-graft agency since February 11.
At the resumed hearing of the case in February, Onoja, counsel to the plaintiff, told the court that Adegbe filed the application pursuant to the provisions of the law and the rules of the court. Onoja urged the court to declare his client's arrest and continued detention by EFCC since as unconstitutional, and a violation his right to personal liberty guaranteed by the 1999 constitution.
He prayed the court to make an order directing EFCC to immediately release the applicant from unlawful detention. Onoja submitted that the arrest and detention of Adegbe by the EFCC violated his right to personal liberty and freedom of movement guaranteed by section 35 and 41 of the 1999 constitution.
The applicant's counsel contended that EFCC's action violated Articles 5, 6 and 12 of the African Charter on human and peoples' rights. He also asked the court to make an order mandating EFCC to release the plaintiff on bail pending hearing of his case at a competent court of jurisdiction.
Onoja argued that there was no material evidence placed before the court to show that the plaintiff was detained on the directive of the Nigeria army as claimed by the EFCC. Opposing the application, Denga, the EFCC counsel, informed the court that the respondent filed a counter affidavit challenging the plaintiff`s motion. Benda contended that
Adegbe was not detained by the EFCC, adding that the ex-ADC was undergoing questioning and was kept on the directive of the Nigeria army. The EFCC counsel, therefore, urged the court to dismiss the application for lack of merit. But the court ruled that the EFCC was "dancing Makossa" in its argument that the army was responsible for the detention of Adegbe. It ordered the release of the applicant.
In his ruling, Justice Yusuf Halilu, ordered the EFCC to release Adegbe on bail pending his arraignment in court. He also told the Nigerian army and any other government agency keeping Col. Adegbe in detention, to immediately obey the court's order, as the order was binding on every government agency.
Justice Halilu wondered why the EFCC had reduced itself to a "police station", stating that the agency must not go beyond what the law requires of it.
According to the judge, the EFCC had no right whatsoever, to detain an individual at will, adding that it was unconstitutional for the agency to keep Adegbe in detention for more than 24 hours.
After the counsel to Adegbe, Ogwu Onoja informed the court that the anti-graft agency had transferred his client to a military facility, the judge stated that his ruling was binding not only on the EFCC, but also on any agency keeping him in detention.
Adegbe hauled the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to court to challenge his arrest and continued detention by the anti-graft agency since February 11.
At the resumed hearing of the case in February, Onoja, counsel to the plaintiff, told the court that Adegbe filed the application pursuant to the provisions of the law and the rules of the court. Onoja urged the court to declare his client's arrest and continued detention by EFCC since as unconstitutional, and a violation his right to personal liberty guaranteed by the 1999 constitution.
He prayed the court to make an order directing EFCC to immediately release the applicant from unlawful detention. Onoja submitted that the arrest and detention of Adegbe by the EFCC violated his right to personal liberty and freedom of movement guaranteed by section 35 and 41 of the 1999 constitution.
The applicant's counsel contended that EFCC's action violated Articles 5, 6 and 12 of the African Charter on human and peoples' rights. He also asked the court to make an order mandating EFCC to release the plaintiff on bail pending hearing of his case at a competent court of jurisdiction.
Onoja argued that there was no material evidence placed before the court to show that the plaintiff was detained on the directive of the Nigeria army as claimed by the EFCC. Opposing the application, Denga, the EFCC counsel, informed the court that the respondent filed a counter affidavit challenging the plaintiff`s motion. Benda contended that
Adegbe was not detained by the EFCC, adding that the ex-ADC was undergoing questioning and was kept on the directive of the Nigeria army. The EFCC counsel, therefore, urged the court to dismiss the application for lack of merit. But the court ruled that the EFCC was "dancing Makossa" in its argument that the army was responsible for the detention of Adegbe. It ordered the release of the applicant.
Related News
Leave a comment...