Forgery Case: Saraki and Ekweremadu have a case to answer- Malami
Fri Jun 24, 2016 07:47:am Politics
1.8K By Buchi Obichie
The Attorney-General of the Federation, AGF, and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN, in a statement issued through his media aide, Mr. Salihu Othman Isah, in Abuja on Thursday, has defended his instituting of a suit against the Senate's principal officers, Bukola Saraki and Ike Ekweremadu; saying he was acting within the ambits of the law, and simply judiciously exercising his powers as the nation's chief law officer who is vested with the authority to initiate criminal proceedings.
He described as 'baseless', allegations that the judiciary was by its action, interfering into the affairs of the legislature.
The AGF insisted that Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki; and his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, have a case to answer over alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Orders, 2015.
He further stated that the Federal Government was committed to the rule of law, and subscribed to the separation of powers.
Malami said what drew his attention to the issue, was a press statement by the Senate, signed by Senator Aliyu Sabi Abdullahi, Chairman, Senate Committee on Media Affairs, on June 19; and that he acted based on recommendations of the IGP.
He said the statement, entitled, Forgery Case, An Unconstitutional Violation of Principles of Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances,' was published in some national dailies and social media platforms.
Malami, who maintained that his office was empowered under Section 174 (1) of the 1999 Constitution and vested with the power to undertake and initiate criminal proceedings in any court of law in Nigeria, accused the Senate of deliberately raising allegations "to whip up sentiments of Nigerians."
His statement read: "The position of the Senate alleging that the move to arraign the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, former Clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa and Deputy Clerk of the National Assembly, Bernard Efeturi before the court last Monday, June 20, for forgery initiated by the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice portends danger, is quite unfortunate.
"That the Senate went on to describe it as wanton abuse of judicial processes and insinuating that the action of the Attorney-General of the Federation, who is the Chief Law Officer of the country, is an interference on the legislature by the executive arm on the affairs of the Red Chambers of the National Assembly; and, therefore, a violation of the principles of separation of powers as enshrined in the Constitution, is also regrettable.
"These allegations are totally untrue and baseless. We are not unaware of the doctrine of separation of powers; and it is not in doubt that each arm of government is constitutionally vested with distinct powers.
"Looking critically at the doctrine of separation of powers, it is a practice that exists on a tripod, viz, the executive, legislature and judiciary, with clearly distinctive functions and responsibilities as captured under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).
"So, by virtue of this, we are committed to the rule of law and will thus keep to the tenets of the rule of law as enshrined in a constitutional democracy like ours.
"The Office of the Attorney General of the Federation is empowered under Section 174 (1) of the Constitution and vested with the power to undertake and initiate criminal proceedings in any court of law in Nigeria.
"By virtue of this power as the Chief Law Officer of the nation, he has simply initiated criminal proceedings for forgery against the affected principal officers in the Senate for altering the Senate Standing Rules, in the Federal High Court.
"It is worthy to note here that the action of the Attorney-General of the Federation can stand the test of any law since he did not act in a vacuum.
"He acted based on a recommendation by the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), having fully satisfied investigative procedure arising from the petition sent to the Nigeria Police by some aggrieved members of the Red Chambers of the National Assembly, alleging that the affected officers altered the rules of the Senate for Dr. Bukola Saraki and Ike Ekweremadu to emerge leaders of the Eighth Senate of the National Assembly.
"Under the 1999 Constitution, only the Attorney-General of the Federation has the powers to institute criminal proceedings.
"For the benefit of doubt, as stated above, there was a petition bordering on allegations of forgery against the defendants; the petition was investigated by the police and the police recommended the case for prosecution.
"At this point, the question is how initiation of criminal proceedings against Dr Bukola Saraki, Ike Ekweremadu, Salisu Maikasuwa and Bernard Efeturi violated the principle of separation of powers as contained in the constitution?
"The action of the Attorney-General of the Federation cannot obviously be said to be a coup against the National Assembly as the Senate has claimed.
"By preferring the charge, the accused persons are entitled to fair hearing under the law, while the prosecution is obligated to prove its case against them beyond reasonable doubts.
"Therefore, the Attorney-General of the Federation has not violated any known law in the land. Or is the Senate suggesting that its principal officers, members and staff of the National Assembly are above the law or enjoy same immunity as do the nation's President and governors?
"It is common knowledge over the years, since the nation embraced democratic system of governance and backed by the current constitution, those elected officers of government, who are exempted from legal encumbrances ,whether it is civil or criminal, are known to all.
"It is pertinent to be reminded too that forgery of the Senate Standing Rules cannot be described as the internal business of the National Assembly that is exclusively only in its purview. The Attorney General of the Federation cannot, therefore, be faulted for his decision to initiate legal actions against the accused for alleged forgery after a thorough police investigation of the issue, whether there was an amendment of the Senate Standing Rules in 2015 or not.
"The case of Adesanya vs Senate, which has been seriously touted in its press statement, does not support them and they should rather take their plea and defend the action accordingly.
"We assure Nigerians that the Attorney-General of the Federation will continue to be committed to the rule of law at all times.
"On this particular forgery case, we believe he should rather be commended for his foresight and political will to carry out his constitutional role to the letter and not to be vilified under any guise."
He described as 'baseless', allegations that the judiciary was by its action, interfering into the affairs of the legislature.
The AGF insisted that Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki; and his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, have a case to answer over alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Orders, 2015.
He further stated that the Federal Government was committed to the rule of law, and subscribed to the separation of powers.
Malami said what drew his attention to the issue, was a press statement by the Senate, signed by Senator Aliyu Sabi Abdullahi, Chairman, Senate Committee on Media Affairs, on June 19; and that he acted based on recommendations of the IGP.
He said the statement, entitled, Forgery Case, An Unconstitutional Violation of Principles of Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances,' was published in some national dailies and social media platforms.
Malami, who maintained that his office was empowered under Section 174 (1) of the 1999 Constitution and vested with the power to undertake and initiate criminal proceedings in any court of law in Nigeria, accused the Senate of deliberately raising allegations "to whip up sentiments of Nigerians."
His statement read: "The position of the Senate alleging that the move to arraign the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, former Clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa and Deputy Clerk of the National Assembly, Bernard Efeturi before the court last Monday, June 20, for forgery initiated by the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice portends danger, is quite unfortunate.
"That the Senate went on to describe it as wanton abuse of judicial processes and insinuating that the action of the Attorney-General of the Federation, who is the Chief Law Officer of the country, is an interference on the legislature by the executive arm on the affairs of the Red Chambers of the National Assembly; and, therefore, a violation of the principles of separation of powers as enshrined in the Constitution, is also regrettable.
"These allegations are totally untrue and baseless. We are not unaware of the doctrine of separation of powers; and it is not in doubt that each arm of government is constitutionally vested with distinct powers.
"Looking critically at the doctrine of separation of powers, it is a practice that exists on a tripod, viz, the executive, legislature and judiciary, with clearly distinctive functions and responsibilities as captured under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).
"So, by virtue of this, we are committed to the rule of law and will thus keep to the tenets of the rule of law as enshrined in a constitutional democracy like ours.
"The Office of the Attorney General of the Federation is empowered under Section 174 (1) of the Constitution and vested with the power to undertake and initiate criminal proceedings in any court of law in Nigeria.
"By virtue of this power as the Chief Law Officer of the nation, he has simply initiated criminal proceedings for forgery against the affected principal officers in the Senate for altering the Senate Standing Rules, in the Federal High Court.
"It is worthy to note here that the action of the Attorney-General of the Federation can stand the test of any law since he did not act in a vacuum.
"He acted based on a recommendation by the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), having fully satisfied investigative procedure arising from the petition sent to the Nigeria Police by some aggrieved members of the Red Chambers of the National Assembly, alleging that the affected officers altered the rules of the Senate for Dr. Bukola Saraki and Ike Ekweremadu to emerge leaders of the Eighth Senate of the National Assembly.
"Under the 1999 Constitution, only the Attorney-General of the Federation has the powers to institute criminal proceedings.
"For the benefit of doubt, as stated above, there was a petition bordering on allegations of forgery against the defendants; the petition was investigated by the police and the police recommended the case for prosecution.
"At this point, the question is how initiation of criminal proceedings against Dr Bukola Saraki, Ike Ekweremadu, Salisu Maikasuwa and Bernard Efeturi violated the principle of separation of powers as contained in the constitution?
"The action of the Attorney-General of the Federation cannot obviously be said to be a coup against the National Assembly as the Senate has claimed.
"By preferring the charge, the accused persons are entitled to fair hearing under the law, while the prosecution is obligated to prove its case against them beyond reasonable doubts.
"Therefore, the Attorney-General of the Federation has not violated any known law in the land. Or is the Senate suggesting that its principal officers, members and staff of the National Assembly are above the law or enjoy same immunity as do the nation's President and governors?
"It is common knowledge over the years, since the nation embraced democratic system of governance and backed by the current constitution, those elected officers of government, who are exempted from legal encumbrances ,whether it is civil or criminal, are known to all.
"It is pertinent to be reminded too that forgery of the Senate Standing Rules cannot be described as the internal business of the National Assembly that is exclusively only in its purview. The Attorney General of the Federation cannot, therefore, be faulted for his decision to initiate legal actions against the accused for alleged forgery after a thorough police investigation of the issue, whether there was an amendment of the Senate Standing Rules in 2015 or not.
"The case of Adesanya vs Senate, which has been seriously touted in its press statement, does not support them and they should rather take their plea and defend the action accordingly.
"We assure Nigerians that the Attorney-General of the Federation will continue to be committed to the rule of law at all times.
"On this particular forgery case, we believe he should rather be commended for his foresight and political will to carry out his constitutional role to the letter and not to be vilified under any guise."
Related News
Leave a comment...